Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27151 - 27160 of 57346 for id.

[PDF] State v. Thomas A. Greve
presiding over subsequent proceedings in the case. Id. Section 971.20(9), provides: (9) JUDGE’S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3995 - 2017-09-20

Lee A. Knowlin v. David H. Schwarz
if it is supported by substantial evidence, even if the evidence would also support a contrary determination. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3600 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Pamela E.P.
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Id. at 6-7, 549 N.W.2d at 413
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13654 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence, which “is oftentimes stronger and more satisfactory than direct evidence.” Id. An appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75291 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Marathon County v. Peggy G.
undermines the ability to parent. Id. at ¶9. Second, if so, the trial court must determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5324 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Yehuda Elmakias v. Michael Wayda
id. at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 663-64. The findings must be specific, because “‘[t]he [frivolous claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14769 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Caryl J. Keip v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
there was “a reasonable basis in law for the theory propounded.” See id. at 337. ¶12 Keip acknowledges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3365 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jerjuan Spiller
hearing will be subject to deferential appellate review. Id. at 310-11. To obtain an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3188 - 2005-03-31

State v. Laura K-T.
§ 48.415(6) even if they lacked the ability to establish a parental relationship. See id. at 684
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6407 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
themselves,” id. at 90, and refers to whether they “lie outside the limits of what is reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98147 - 2014-09-15