Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 69083 for as he.
Search results 2731 - 2740 of 69083 for as he.
State v. Stephen Pritchard
. SNYDER, J. Stephen Pritchard appeals from an order finding that he refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
. SNYDER, J. Stephen Pritchard appeals from an order finding that he refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John D. Tiggs, Jr.
, rather than his given name. He asserts that he has a “positive right” to the use of his legal name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4459 - 2017-09-19
, rather than his given name. He asserts that he has a “positive right” to the use of his legal name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4459 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of West Allis v. Robert C. Braun
and distributed flyers just outside the entrance to the school. The school principal told Braun to leave; he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7127 - 2017-09-20
and distributed flyers just outside the entrance to the school. The school principal told Braun to leave; he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7127 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to file a response, but he has not done so. After considering the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170707 - 2017-09-21
was advised of his right to file a response, but he has not done so. After considering the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170707 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for attempted child enticement. Mills argues he: (1) was denied due process because he was not present during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52724 - 2010-08-02
for attempted child enticement. Mills argues he: (1) was denied due process because he was not present during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52724 - 2010-08-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Hill argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175383 - 2017-09-21
. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Hill argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175383 - 2017-09-21
State v. Avery L. Dallapiazza
the trial court’s order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1997–1998) motion for postconviction relief.[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4615 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1997–1998) motion for postconviction relief.[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4615 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) that he is currently dangerous under § 51.20 and (2) that he is incompetent to refuse medication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26
) that he is currently dangerous under § 51.20 and (2) that he is incompetent to refuse medication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Ted Ricci
contained an advertisement for non-party Amoco. No. 01-2186 3 ¶5 Ricci testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4300 - 2017-09-19
contained an advertisement for non-party Amoco. No. 01-2186 3 ¶5 Ricci testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4300 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. He contends the circuit court erred when it determined his trial counsel was not ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118314 - 2014-09-15
relief. He contends the circuit court erred when it determined his trial counsel was not ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118314 - 2014-09-15