Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27391 - 27400 of 29828 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional due process subject to de novo review. See State v. Prineas, 2012 WI App 2, ¶15, 338 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290186 - 2020-09-22

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Dodson
to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4941 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. Id. ¶24 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149221 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jason R. Dixon
review de novo. State v. Groth, 2002 WI App 299, ¶21, ___Wis. 2d ___, 655 N.W.2d 163. A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5327 - 2005-03-31

Henry C. Reget v. Norma Zelazo Paige
to by the parties, constitute oppression is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Davis v. Sheerin, 754 S.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15319 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Douglas Scott Geen v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
conclusion of law, there are three possible levels of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4475 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223908 - 2018-11-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts de novo. Id. ¶19 The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317204 - 2020-12-22

[PDF] State v. Jay A. Starkweather
a defendant to relief is a question of law we review de novo. Id. However, if the motion does fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13808 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. This court reviews a circuit court’s denial of a motion for an evidentiary hearing de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55340 - 2010-11-09