Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2741 - 2750 of 58479 for speedy trial.

[PDF] George M.S. v. Heidi Hida
as a sanction for what the trial court described as George’s unjustified, persistent and egregious refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20807 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
joined together for trial. ¶4 On the morning of trial, both Grace and Corneil failed to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141476 - 2015-05-11

[PDF] Marilyn Olinger v. John David Olinger
the trial court’s order determining the amount of a child support arrearage owed to her by her former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14454 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
) the trial court should have granted his motion for a new trial in the interests of justice; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35175 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
) the trial court should have granted his motion for a new trial in the interests of justice; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35175 - 2009-01-12

[PDF] State v. George Melvin Taylor
. 1 The Honorable Timothy G. Dugan presided over the ch. 980 trial, while the Honorable Jeffrey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6560 - 2017-09-19

State v. George Melvin Taylor
to be a sexually violent person, and an order denying his postcommitment motion. Taylor contends that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6560 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Walter Lee Thomas
., and from an order denying his request for a new trial. On appeal, Thomas argues that: (1) he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11162 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
and as a habitual offender. Jines then filed a postconviction motion alleging the ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33898 - 2008-09-02

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
. On appeal, Jeffrey, an attorney, argues that: (1) the trial court improperly allocated $25,481 attributed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77644 - 2012-02-06