Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27401 - 27410 of 59722 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 27401 - 27410 of 59722 for quit claim deed/1000.
Darrell E. Beth v. Margaret R. Beth
as the fact finder. The trial court rejected Darrell’s claim that he made additional child support payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12340 - 2005-03-31
as the fact finder. The trial court rejected Darrell’s claim that he made additional child support payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12340 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
modification, claiming that a new factor existed that justified reducing his sentence. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9888 - 2005-03-31
modification, claiming that a new factor existed that justified reducing his sentence. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9888 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his claims of error. To begin, he fails to provide any citations to the record, and “we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234115 - 2019-02-06
of his claims of error. To begin, he fails to provide any citations to the record, and “we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234115 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Like the circuit court, we regard this as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, requiring
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
. Like the circuit court, we regard this as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, requiring
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
Washington County v. Richard E. Hupfer
contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, 2012 WI App 134, ¶4, 345 Wis. 2d 351, 825 N.W.2d 311. Here, Everett’s petition claimed that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104957 - 2013-12-02
, 2012 WI App 134, ¶4, 345 Wis. 2d 351, 825 N.W.2d 311. Here, Everett’s petition claimed that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104957 - 2013-12-02
Sunburst IV Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
a Wisconsin Real Estate Transfer Return to document the transaction, claiming an exemption from real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
a Wisconsin Real Estate Transfer Return to document the transaction, claiming an exemption from real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5664 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Nichols
to §§ 943.20(1)(a), 943.20(3)(a), 943.11, 943.01 and 939.05, STATS. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10743 - 2017-09-20
to §§ 943.20(1)(a), 943.20(3)(a), 943.11, 943.01 and 939.05, STATS. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10743 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP2662 Cir. Ct. No. 2005CV78
appeals an order dismissing his claim against Hastings Mutual Insurance Company for underinsured
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30064 - 2014-09-15
appeals an order dismissing his claim against Hastings Mutual Insurance Company for underinsured
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30064 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
expressly authorizes the action.” She claims that because the court did not expressly authorize out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68131 - 2011-07-19
expressly authorizes the action.” She claims that because the court did not expressly authorize out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68131 - 2011-07-19