Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2751 - 2760 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2751 - 2760 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90931 - 2012-12-26
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90931 - 2012-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90931 - 2014-09-15
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90931 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Garland’s motion for sentence credit. Garland was sent a copy of the report and has filed a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255513 - 2020-02-27
Garland’s motion for sentence credit. Garland was sent a copy of the report and has filed a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255513 - 2020-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to reconsider the sentence credit determination.[2] Because the circuit court properly concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
motion to reconsider the sentence credit determination.[2] Because the circuit court properly concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2006CF4804 on June 3, 2011, denying his motion to reconsider the sentence credit determination.2 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90409 - 2014-09-15
No. 2006CF4804 on June 3, 2011, denying his motion to reconsider the sentence credit determination.2 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90409 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leonard C. Matson
and burglary, both as a repeat offender, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6109 - 2017-09-19
and burglary, both as a repeat offender, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6109 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court from granting Swid Law’s summary judgment motion. We conclude, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233249 - 2019-01-23
the circuit court from granting Swid Law’s summary judgment motion. We conclude, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233249 - 2019-01-23
State v. Leonard C. Matson
for child abduction and burglary, both as a repeat offender, and from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6109 - 2005-03-31
for child abduction and burglary, both as a repeat offender, and from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6109 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, C.J. 1 Lazeric R. Maxey appeals from an order denying his motion for a 138-day credit against his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164802 - 2017-09-21
, C.J. 1 Lazeric R. Maxey appeals from an order denying his motion for a 138-day credit against his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164802 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ motion to suppress his statements at the hospital, finding that Bavers was not in custody when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254922 - 2020-02-20
’ motion to suppress his statements at the hospital, finding that Bavers was not in custody when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254922 - 2020-02-20