Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27611 - 27620 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27611 - 27620 of 29823 for des.
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16756 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16756 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
questions of law reviewed de novo. Water Well Sols. Serv. Grp., 369 Wis. 2d 607, ¶12; Air Eng'g, Inc. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236314 - 2019-02-28
questions of law reviewed de novo. Water Well Sols. Serv. Grp., 369 Wis. 2d 607, ¶12; Air Eng'g, Inc. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236314 - 2019-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(interpretation of a constitutional provision is a question of law reviewed de novo); see also Predick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630656 - 2023-03-09
(interpretation of a constitutional provision is a question of law reviewed de novo); see also Predick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630656 - 2023-03-09
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16975 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16975 - 2017-09-21
Daanen & Janssen, Inc v. Cedarapids, Inc
has stated a claim for relief is a pure question of law, which we review de novo. See Sunnyslope
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17254 - 2005-03-31
has stated a claim for relief is a pure question of law, which we review de novo. See Sunnyslope
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alan L. Radke
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Lindsey, 203 Wis. 2d 423, 432, 554 N.W.2d 215 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4174 - 2017-09-19
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Lindsey, 203 Wis. 2d 423, 432, 554 N.W.2d 215 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4174 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Peter G. Tkacz
rights involves a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 6. “A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21
rights involves a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 6. “A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 11
the verdict is de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Logterman v. Dawson, 190 Wis. 2d 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158224 - 2017-09-21
the verdict is de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Logterman v. Dawson, 190 Wis. 2d 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158224 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62866 - 2011-04-19
State v. Kathleen A. Benoit
standard of a constitutionally valid plea presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18016 - 2005-05-04
standard of a constitutionally valid plea presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18016 - 2005-05-04