Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27631 - 27640 of 65143 for or b.
Search results 27631 - 27640 of 65143 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 971.08(1)(b), the court asked the prosecutor for the factual basis for the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113667 - 2014-06-03
. Stat. § 971.08(1)(b), the court asked the prosecutor for the factual basis for the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113667 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Dillis V. Allen
the influence of alcohol, (b) whether the officer read the person the Informing the Accused form, and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3605 - 2017-09-19
the influence of alcohol, (b) whether the officer read the person the Informing the Accused form, and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3605 - 2017-09-19
State v. Anthony W. Quattrochi
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The judgment and order were appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The judgment and order were appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
State v. John W. Page
on that issue “[b]ecause the court did not require that the jury find beyond reasonable doubt that Peete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15814 - 2005-03-31
on that issue “[b]ecause the court did not require that the jury find beyond reasonable doubt that Peete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15814 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 941.30(1) and 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 941.30(1) and 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b) (2009–10).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72328 - 2011-10-17
)(b) (2009–10).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72328 - 2011-10-17
[PDF]
WI 48
in Wisconsin. (b) That his or her resumption of the practice of law will not be detrimental
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97422 - 2014-09-15
in Wisconsin. (b) That his or her resumption of the practice of law will not be detrimental
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97422 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lisa A. Koenigs v. Frank H. Coker
(3)(b), (c), (d), (m). We will not, as Lisa does, separate the reasons given by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6523 - 2017-09-19
(3)(b), (c), (d), (m). We will not, as Lisa does, separate the reasons given by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6523 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David Kons
that the one party consent tapes were admissible under § 968.29(3)(b), STATS. During trial, Kons objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8127 - 2017-09-19
that the one party consent tapes were admissible under § 968.29(3)(b), STATS. During trial, Kons objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8127 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
buy.” As for the confidential informant’s reliability, the State asserts that “[b]ased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21
buy.” As for the confidential informant’s reliability, the State asserts that “[b]ased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21