Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27631 - 27640 of 65143 for or b.
Search results 27631 - 27640 of 65143 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 941.30(1) and 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 941.30(1) and 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b) (2009–10).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72328 - 2011-10-17
)(b) (2009–10).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72328 - 2011-10-17
[PDF]
WI 48
in Wisconsin. (b) That his or her resumption of the practice of law will not be detrimental
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97422 - 2014-09-15
in Wisconsin. (b) That his or her resumption of the practice of law will not be detrimental
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97422 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lisa A. Koenigs v. Frank H. Coker
(3)(b), (c), (d), (m). We will not, as Lisa does, separate the reasons given by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6523 - 2017-09-19
(3)(b), (c), (d), (m). We will not, as Lisa does, separate the reasons given by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6523 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David Kons
that the one party consent tapes were admissible under § 968.29(3)(b), STATS. During trial, Kons objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8127 - 2017-09-19
that the one party consent tapes were admissible under § 968.29(3)(b), STATS. During trial, Kons objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8127 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
buy.” As for the confidential informant’s reliability, the State asserts that “[b]ased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21
buy.” As for the confidential informant’s reliability, the State asserts that “[b]ased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brady T. Terrill
the circuit court accepts a plea agreement, not after. As the holding in Comstock states: [B]efore accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2902 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court accepts a plea agreement, not after. As the holding in Comstock states: [B]efore accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992). ¶19 Examples B, C, and D are excerpts from a deputy’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67815 - 2014-09-15
.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992). ¶19 Examples B, C, and D are excerpts from a deputy’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67815 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. (b) Advise the clients to seek legal advice of their choice elsewhere. (c) Promptly provide
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237908 - 2019-03-22
. (b) Advise the clients to seek legal advice of their choice elsewhere. (c) Promptly provide
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237908 - 2019-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 943.32(2) (amended Feb. 1, 2003), and robbery with the threat of force, in violation of 943.32(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35938 - 2009-03-23
. § 943.32(2) (amended Feb. 1, 2003), and robbery with the threat of force, in violation of 943.32(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35938 - 2009-03-23