Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27631 - 27640 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
entitle him to a new trial. I. Legal standards. ¶13 To establish a claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35584 - 2009-02-17

[PDF] Lawyer Regulation System of the State of Wisconsin v. David C. Williams
On January 7, 2000, Williams filed a claim on behalf of Su Wings with the City of Lake Geneva, pursuant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16701 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rosemary K. Oliveira v. City of Milwaukee
and Smart live, and Smart owns a business, near the development. Oliveira and Smart claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14430 - 2017-09-21

Libbie Pesek v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
shoes, depth inlay, one pair." Pesek claims that the department was not justified in applying
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13457 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 112
, this court publicly reprimanded Attorney Crandall for knowingly advancing a claim that was unwarranted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33607 - 2014-09-15

State v. Gregory R. Bloom
the penalty enhancer. His claims on appeal center on whether he was denied his right to a fair trial either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6575 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Leroy Riesch v. David Schwarz
to Wisconsin law by revoking his parole status. Specifically, he claims that such a status never existed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16776 - 2017-09-21

Scott R. Meyer v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Co.
of the “reasonable cost of collection” under § 102.29(1).[2] Michigan Mutual claims that the circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14837 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a federal habeas corpus petition asserting multiple claims, including ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157472 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
28, 2007, seeking a declaratory judgment. Chicago Title claimed that $14,000 was the proper amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53888 - 2010-08-31