Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27651 - 27660 of 63248 for records.
Search results 27651 - 27660 of 63248 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there would be no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101988 - 2017-09-21
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there would be no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bryant U.
, although they provide colorable cover for Bryant U.’s arguments, do not, when the record is analyzed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17974 - 2017-09-21
, although they provide colorable cover for Bryant U.’s arguments, do not, when the record is analyzed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17974 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
determined that it lacked competency to address Rayford’s claims. Based upon the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806515 - 2024-05-29
determined that it lacked competency to address Rayford’s claims. Based upon the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806515 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=809656 - 2024-06-11
an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=809656 - 2024-06-11
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92057 - 2013-01-22
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92057 - 2013-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
submission, and that we independently examined the record. See id., unpublished op. and order at 1-2. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
submission, and that we independently examined the record. See id., unpublished op. and order at 1-2. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
mouth-to-penis intercourse on him. The record also reflects that, after the State filed the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121337 - 2014-09-16
mouth-to-penis intercourse on him. The record also reflects that, after the State filed the criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121337 - 2014-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the defendant’s past record of criminal offenses, history of undesirable behavior patterns, culpability
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211006 - 2018-04-09
the defendant’s past record of criminal offenses, history of undesirable behavior patterns, culpability
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211006 - 2018-04-09
[PDF]
Norman C. Green, Jr. v. Jon E. Litscher
, and that the record should reflect that this claim remains pending. However, as we stated above, the court clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5958 - 2017-09-19
, and that the record should reflect that this claim remains pending. However, as we stated above, the court clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5958 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that was. [TRIAL COUNSEL:] Perhaps it’s in the court record, the court reporter’s record. THE COURT: I don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656581 - 2023-05-16
that was. [TRIAL COUNSEL:] Perhaps it’s in the court record, the court reporter’s record. THE COURT: I don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656581 - 2023-05-16