Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2771 - 2780 of 9856 for WA 08.
Search results 2771 - 2780 of 9856 for WA 08.
COURT OF APPEALS
of a child. See Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2007-08).[1] The court imposed a bifurcated sentence of ten years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
of a child. See Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2007-08).[1] The court imposed a bifurcated sentence of ten years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37529 - 2009-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
beyond a reasonable doubt that there was .08 grams or more of alcohol in 100 milliliters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13
beyond a reasonable doubt that there was .08 grams or more of alcohol in 100 milliliters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13
09AP574 State v. Gerald A. LaDue.doc
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38058 - 2009-07-21
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38058 - 2009-07-21
State v. Allen T. Peterson
that the lower prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) of .08 for persons with two or more prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13037 - 2005-03-31
that the lower prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) of .08 for persons with two or more prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13037 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with intent to deliver cocaine in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)4. (2007-08).[1] The State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36796 - 2009-06-16
with intent to deliver cocaine in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)4. (2007-08).[1] The State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36796 - 2009-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a condemnation commission under WIS. STAT. § 32.05(9) (2007-08).1 The court referred the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51818 - 2014-09-15
for a condemnation commission under WIS. STAT. § 32.05(9) (2007-08).1 The court referred the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51818 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a condemnation commission under WIS. STAT. § 32.05(9) (2007-08).1 The court referred the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51817 - 2014-09-15
for a condemnation commission under WIS. STAT. § 32.05(9) (2007-08).1 The court referred the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51817 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a postconviction motion filed under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2007-08).1 ¶3 All of Mitchell’s arguments are based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45773 - 2014-09-15
of a postconviction motion filed under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2007-08).1 ¶3 All of Mitchell’s arguments are based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45773 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 172 Wis. 2d 660, 663, 494 N.W.2d 204 (1993), superseded by statute, WIS. STAT. § 30.133 (2007- 08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35921 - 2014-09-15
, 172 Wis. 2d 660, 663, 494 N.W.2d 204 (1993), superseded by statute, WIS. STAT. § 30.133 (2007- 08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2007-08).1 Davis responded to the no-merit report. After considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39496 - 2014-09-15
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2007-08).1 Davis responded to the no-merit report. After considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39496 - 2014-09-15