Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27711 - 27720 of 41599 for she's.

State v. Russell Martin
was deficient and that he or she was prejudiced by the deficient performance. See Strickland v. Washington, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15182 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Leonard R. Avery
was the one who had broken them down and disposed of them. Roby said that after she heard this information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21746 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that it was modifying the terms of the divorce judgment to require Patrick to pay Rojeanna now that she was the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843830 - 2024-08-29

James J. Kaufman v. Judy P. Smith
that she had not received any official papers naming her as a defendant in a lawsuit and that Kaufman had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5120 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed that he [or she] was not free
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
in marijuana) as a second or subsequent offense, and felony bail jumping. C.S. told police that she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95943 - 2014-09-15

WI App 44 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP958-CR Complete Titl...
]. And she has indicated things that she will be presenting to the Court. But it was quite a contrast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46888 - 2010-03-30

COURT OF APPEALS
, which she did not pass. Kinservik arrested Billips for OWI. Kinservik secured Billips in handcuffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71784 - 2011-10-04

COURT OF APPEALS
or she must so advise the court and request permission to withdraw, supporting the request with a brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42058 - 2009-10-13

COURT OF APPEALS
. ยง 974.06 using a familiar standard. The movant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing only if he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101685 - 2013-09-09