Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27721 - 27730 of 33825 for summary.
Search results 27721 - 27730 of 33825 for summary.
COURT OF APPEALS
first appeal, Jones appealed the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment to Courtyard Apartments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49875 - 2010-05-10
first appeal, Jones appealed the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment to Courtyard Apartments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49875 - 2010-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
been terminated within three years of the CHIPS order. The court therefore granted partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35966 - 2009-03-22
been terminated within three years of the CHIPS order. The court therefore granted partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35966 - 2009-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
). See, e.g., Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d at 357. ¶15 In summary, we conclude that even assuming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55771 - 2010-10-20
). See, e.g., Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d at 357. ¶15 In summary, we conclude that even assuming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55771 - 2010-10-20
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily affirm. In March
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140022 - 2015-04-14
is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily affirm. In March
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140022 - 2015-04-14
CA Blank Order
revocation summary, recommended twelve months in jail. Defense counsel argued at sentencing that Collins’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117400 - 2014-07-22
revocation summary, recommended twelve months in jail. Defense counsel argued at sentencing that Collins’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117400 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
. The court discussed the matter in closed conference on February 22, 2018. As the foregoing summary
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211167 - 2018-04-12
. The court discussed the matter in closed conference on February 22, 2018. As the foregoing summary
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211167 - 2018-04-12
[PDF]
State v. Steven Wroten
of his sweatshirt. In summary, we conclude that Wroten’s ability to present his defense to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11690 - 2017-09-20
of his sweatshirt. In summary, we conclude that Wroten’s ability to present his defense to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11690 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
formulation as a shorthand version or summary of the correct standard. We do not believe this passage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33186 - 2014-09-15
formulation as a shorthand version or summary of the correct standard. We do not believe this passage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33186 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jarred H.
a potential sixty-year maximum sentence was not unduly harsh. In summary, the Court believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21364 - 2017-09-21
a potential sixty-year maximum sentence was not unduly harsh. In summary, the Court believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21364 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
].” The court’s imprecise summary of this method was not a deviation from the “substantial probability of harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72857 - 2011-10-24
].” The court’s imprecise summary of this method was not a deviation from the “substantial probability of harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72857 - 2011-10-24