Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27751 - 27760 of 58508 for speedy trial.
Search results 27751 - 27760 of 58508 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Tim D. Johnson v. Major James Zanon
, with only a blanket for protection. The trial court ruled that summary judgment affidavits contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8632 - 2017-09-19
, with only a blanket for protection. The trial court ruled that summary judgment affidavits contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8632 - 2017-09-19
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7754 - 2005-03-31
for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court violated Knapp's First Amendment rights by considering his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7754 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18).1 Eppenger argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242375 - 2019-06-17
to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18).1 Eppenger argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242375 - 2019-06-17
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth M. W.
. The issue is whether the trial court erred in applying a preponderance-of-the-evidence burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
. The issue is whether the trial court erred in applying a preponderance-of-the-evidence burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
supplement benefits (“caretaker benefits”). We conclude that the trial court correctly affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48448 - 2014-09-15
supplement benefits (“caretaker benefits”). We conclude that the trial court correctly affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48448 - 2014-09-15
State v. Douglas K. Uhde
that he did not enter a knowing and voluntary plea, for two reasons: (1) the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5918 - 2005-03-31
that he did not enter a knowing and voluntary plea, for two reasons: (1) the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5918 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
that, in the context of a criminal jury trial utilizing a general verdict, the trial court erred by not making findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
that, in the context of a criminal jury trial utilizing a general verdict, the trial court erred by not making findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as a seventh offense, in 2006. He represented himself at trial after the court found that he had waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116151 - 2017-09-21
, as a seventh offense, in 2006. He represented himself at trial after the court found that he had waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116151 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roy U. Schenk v. Michael Clark
-1874 2 Tammy Clark.1 The trial court declared Clark the owner of the disputed property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2798 - 2017-09-19
-1874 2 Tammy Clark.1 The trial court declared Clark the owner of the disputed property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2798 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jeffrey E. Sobczak v. Eleanor Ciganek
. After a trial, the jury awarded Sobczak $275,750, including $100,000 for his loss of future earning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3371 - 2017-09-19
. After a trial, the jury awarded Sobczak $275,750, including $100,000 for his loss of future earning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3371 - 2017-09-19

