Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27771 - 27780 of 75486 for judgment for us.
Search results 27771 - 27780 of 75486 for judgment for us.
[PDF]
2009AP2868; oral argument dates for April, 2011
. of Revenue What evaluation standards are to be used by the Tax Appeals Commission to assess specialized
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60220 - 2014-09-15
. of Revenue What evaluation standards are to be used by the Tax Appeals Commission to assess specialized
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60220 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
January 21, 2011
. of Revenue What evaluation standards are to be used by the Tax Appeals Commission to assess specialized
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59300 - 2014-09-15
. of Revenue What evaluation standards are to be used by the Tax Appeals Commission to assess specialized
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added recent decisions in case nos. 2008AP322, 2009AP1559 and 2010AP321
. of Revenue What evaluation standards are to be used by the Tax Appeals Commission to assess specialized
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59769 - 2014-09-15
. of Revenue What evaluation standards are to be used by the Tax Appeals Commission to assess specialized
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59769 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
December 23, 2010
evaluation standards are to be used by the Tax Appeals Commission to assess specialized manufacturing
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58326 - 2014-09-15
evaluation standards are to be used by the Tax Appeals Commission to assess specialized manufacturing
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58326 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 95
on summary judgment. The commission agreed with the Department that the DeJope property was not “designated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32574 - 2011-06-14
on summary judgment. The commission agreed with the Department that the DeJope property was not “designated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32574 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI APP 95
the Department on summary judgment. The commission agreed with the Department that the DeJope property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32574 - 2014-09-15
the Department on summary judgment. The commission agreed with the Department that the DeJope property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32574 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. (Hartford) appeals from an order granting summary judgment declaring void Hartford’s dissolution by its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28425 - 2014-09-15
. (Hartford) appeals from an order granting summary judgment declaring void Hartford’s dissolution by its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28425 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
Service, Inc. (Hartford) appeals from an order granting summary judgment declaring void Hartford’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28425 - 2007-03-13
Service, Inc. (Hartford) appeals from an order granting summary judgment declaring void Hartford’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28425 - 2007-03-13
[PDF]
State v. Gregg A. Pfaff
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: PATRICK C. HAUGHNEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6473 - 2017-09-19
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: PATRICK C. HAUGHNEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6473 - 2017-09-19
State v. Parrish C. Payne
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12467 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12467 - 2005-03-31