Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27801 - 27810 of 46683 for adult name change.
Search results 27801 - 27810 of 46683 for adult name change.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
their request to change the assessment. The Christles then filed a petition for writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145382 - 2017-09-21
their request to change the assessment. The Christles then filed a petition for writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145382 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Updated: December 6, 2006
40.14 Relating to Technical Changes in Language in Board of Bar Examiner’s Fees, filed by Gene R
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27386 - 2014-09-15
40.14 Relating to Technical Changes in Language in Board of Bar Examiner’s Fees, filed by Gene R
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27386 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jackie Green
effect, if any, a change in sentence credit would have on Green’s current situation. See Sweet v. Berge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16209 - 2005-03-31
effect, if any, a change in sentence credit would have on Green’s current situation. See Sweet v. Berge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16209 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lonna L. Handschke
changed Handschke’s sentence because the court had considered the fact that she was a person who had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12336 - 2005-03-31
changed Handschke’s sentence because the court had considered the fact that she was a person who had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12336 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, B&K does not explain how, if we agree with it on this issue, this would change the outcome. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34590 - 2008-11-12
. However, B&K does not explain how, if we agree with it on this issue, this would change the outcome. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34590 - 2008-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Lonna L. Handschke
that the alleged “new factors” would not have changed Handschke’s sentence because the court had considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12336 - 2017-09-21
that the alleged “new factors” would not have changed Handschke’s sentence because the court had considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12336 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
changes from the Board of Administrative Oversight (BAO); Keith L. Sellen, Director, Office of Lawyer
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242937 - 2019-06-26
changes from the Board of Administrative Oversight (BAO); Keith L. Sellen, Director, Office of Lawyer
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242937 - 2019-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
not qualify as a new factor. We have previously held that a post‑sentencing change in the law is not a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51064 - 2010-08-09
not qualify as a new factor. We have previously held that a post‑sentencing change in the law is not a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51064 - 2010-08-09
Updated: December 6, 2006
to Technical Changes in Language in Board of Bar Examiner’s Fees, filed by Gene R Rankin, Director, Board
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27386 - 2006-12-05
to Technical Changes in Language in Board of Bar Examiner’s Fees, filed by Gene R Rankin, Director, Board
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27386 - 2006-12-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
for defendant’s change of heart other than the desire to have a trial.” Id. (citation omitted). The defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29758 - 2014-09-15
for defendant’s change of heart other than the desire to have a trial.” Id. (citation omitted). The defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29758 - 2014-09-15