Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27811 - 27820 of 30185 for de.
Search results 27811 - 27820 of 30185 for de.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241676 - 2019-06-05
standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241676 - 2019-06-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. We need not address both aspects of the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259855 - 2020-05-07
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. We need not address both aspects of the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259855 - 2020-05-07
[PDF]
WI 14
unless they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92284 - 2014-09-15
unless they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92284 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
)(br). Whether a statute is constitutional presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116170 - 2014-07-02
)(br). Whether a statute is constitutional presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116170 - 2014-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that an appellate court reviews No. 2024AP203 6 de novo.” Outagamie County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879380 - 2024-11-21
of law that an appellate court reviews No. 2024AP203 6 de novo.” Outagamie County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879380 - 2024-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. We review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. We review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06
[PDF]
WI App 11
us on appeal. No. 2015AP2033 8 ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182577 - 2017-09-21
us on appeal. No. 2015AP2033 8 ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 259
. ¶42 Again, our standard of review is de novo as this involves the interpretation of the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30842 - 2014-09-15
. ¶42 Again, our standard of review is de novo as this involves the interpretation of the costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30842 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Oneida County DSS v. Therese S., 2008 WI App 159, ¶7, 314 Wis. 2d 493, 762 N.W.2d 122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48077 - 2010-03-17
reviews de novo. Oneida County DSS v. Therese S., 2008 WI App 159, ¶7, 314 Wis. 2d 493, 762 N.W.2d 122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48077 - 2010-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion raised sufficient facts to get a hearing is de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125544 - 2014-11-03
the motion raised sufficient facts to get a hearing is de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125544 - 2014-11-03