Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27821 - 27830 of 41618 for she.

State v. Scott Elvers
and the defendant additionally alleges that he or she did not understand that the circuit court was not bound
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18765 - 2005-06-28

[PDF] State v. Russell Martin
show both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that he or she was prejudiced by the deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15182 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robert E. Mathias v. Ford Credit Corporation
. ¶17 During her deposition, Kellar acknowledged that she knew the purpose of signing the release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4121 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
Griffin moved for reconsideration. She argued that ratification does not apply to fraudulent transfers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73242 - 2011-11-08

State v. Paul Matek
is not deficient unless he or she “made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Chad E. Lamberies
must first make a prima facie showing that he or she did not know or understand the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20539 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Jurkovic
. At that point, Officer Walsh told Jurkovic that she needed a yes or no answer. Jurkovic did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16299 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
background: Vicki L. Blasing bought lumber from a Menards store. She drove her pickup truck to the Menards
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=488&year=2013

[PDF] State v. James O. Edwards
if he or she “was convicted of a felony during the 5-year period immediately preceding the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3684 - 2017-09-19

Mateo D.O. v. Circuit Court for Winnebago County
requires the party to sign a motion or paper only if he or she is appearing pro se. Cf. Dungan v. County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7679 - 2005-05-09