Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27911 - 27920 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. Tony M. Smith
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16976 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
the untainted portions of an affidavit support probable cause de novo. See United States v. Martin, 426 F.3d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38717 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 23
on the pleadings is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Freedom from Religion Found., Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35244 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 695 N.W.2d 277. The application of constitutional principles to those facts is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132150 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
under the same standard [that] we apply to a circuit court’s conclusions of law—de novo.” Tetra Tech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589160 - 2022-11-09

State v. Marvin L. Hereford
., presents a question of law, which we decide de novo without deference to the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7922 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Xiong Yang
of § 885.37(1), STATS. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8705 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 140
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo.” Grosse v. Protective Life Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39214 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Patients Compensation Fund v. Lutheran Hospital-LaCrosse, Inc.
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Hartman v. Winnebago County, 216 Wis. 2d 418, 430
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17115 - 2017-09-21

Wayne A. Briesemeister v. Philip Lehner
de novo, applying the same method as the trial court. Green Spring Farms, 136 Wis. 2d at 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25691 - 2006-07-26