Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28051 - 28060 of 84057 for simple case search.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with instructions to the trial court upon remand. BACKGROUND ¶2 The facts of this case are generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179603 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 77
2025 WI App 77 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2025AP1745
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041774 - 2026-01-26

2006 WI APP 249
2006 WI App 249 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1212 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27294 - 2006-12-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
written notice of injury. We disagree and conclude that Jones has not rebutted the prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676066 - 2023-07-07

[PDF] Sauk County v. Marcus J. Gumz
2003 WI App 165 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0204
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4863 - 2017-09-19

Sauk County v. Marcus J. Gumz
2003 WI App 165 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0204 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4863 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
2011 WI 22 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 09AP118 Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63221 - 2011-04-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
materials do not rebut Veritas’s prima facie case. ¶2 On de novo review, we conclude that Veritas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737692 - 2023-12-12

[PDF] State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16321 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kywanda F.
if the juvenile suffers actual prejudice. Because the factual record in this case is insufficient
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16923 - 2017-09-21