Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28181 - 28190 of 39176 for c's.
Search results 28181 - 28190 of 39176 for c's.
State v. Frederick L. Howell
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge.[1] Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2800 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge.[1] Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2800 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tommy Lopez
or promised him anything so that he would give up his rights. Lopez said he was “[c]ertainly” satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26129 - 2006-08-07
or promised him anything so that he would give up his rights. Lopez said he was “[c]ertainly” satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26129 - 2006-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
juror; (b) not objecting to the State’s references to the “missing tape”; and (c) not filing a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80031 - 2014-09-15
juror; (b) not objecting to the State’s references to the “missing tape”; and (c) not filing a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80031 - 2014-09-15
State v. James W. Gomez
waived his right to counsel. The only issue is whether he was competent to conduct his own defense. “[C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4950 - 2005-03-31
waived his right to counsel. The only issue is whether he was competent to conduct his own defense. “[C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4950 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel D. King
A. Lautenschlager, attorney general, and William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general. 2005 WI App 224
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19747 - 2005-10-27
A. Lautenschlager, attorney general, and William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general. 2005 WI App 224
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19747 - 2005-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Michael Thompson
. WIS. STAT. § 971.14(3)(c). ¶20 At the plea hearing, the trial court addressed Thompson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3411 - 2017-09-19
. WIS. STAT. § 971.14(3)(c). ¶20 At the plea hearing, the trial court addressed Thompson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3411 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Fasulo observed Destiny “[c]rying … [and] curled up … into the fetal position on the bed.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59522 - 2014-09-15
Fasulo observed Destiny “[c]rying … [and] curled up … into the fetal position on the bed.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59522 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
; therefore, it was not prejudicial. C. The asking of one question concerning Scott Matysik’s motorcyclist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39960 - 2009-08-24
; therefore, it was not prejudicial. C. The asking of one question concerning Scott Matysik’s motorcyclist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39960 - 2009-08-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
it denied Dietrich’s postconviction request for B.T.’s mental health records. C. Sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37534 - 2014-09-15
it denied Dietrich’s postconviction request for B.T.’s mental health records. C. Sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37534 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John Kruczek v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
—will adjudicate the dispute. See WIS. STAT. § 109.11(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7226 - 2017-09-20
—will adjudicate the dispute. See WIS. STAT. § 109.11(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7226 - 2017-09-20