Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28191 - 28200 of 58969 for quit claim deed.

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
. The court of appeals rejected all Mikrut's claims in an unpublished decision affirming the judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16754 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Village of Hobart v. Brown County
. The County attempts to dismiss the Village's claim on the theory of equitable estoppel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18579 - 2017-09-21

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
. The court of appeals rejected all Mikrut's claims in an unpublished decision affirming the judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16732 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
with her in her apartment that night, he claims he was there around 9:30 p.m. Based on eye witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4499 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
postconviction relief.1 Jackson claims he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49294 - 2014-09-15

M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Kazim Investments, Inc.
sale had been given, with Kazim’s attorney claiming, incorrectly, that this had deprived Kazim from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20802 - 2005-12-27

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
. The court of appeals rejected all Mikrut's claims in an unpublished decision affirming the judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16762 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
.[1] Jackson claims he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49294 - 2010-04-26

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
. The court of appeals rejected all Mikrut's claims in an unpublished decision affirming the judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16744 - 2005-03-31

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Travis L. Bailey
Family settled Bailey’s claims against its insureds by paying the limit of Levy’s policy, $25,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20464 - 2005-11-30