Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28241 - 28250 of 63539 for records.
Search results 28241 - 28250 of 63539 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirm because the circuit court’s denial of the plea withdrawal motion is supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71222 - 2011-09-27
. We affirm because the circuit court’s denial of the plea withdrawal motion is supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71222 - 2011-09-27
[PDF]
William McCracken v. Zorka Romanovic
by an official record. See id. at 714-15. As a result, the court concluded “[t]hat a hearing de novo is more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5678 - 2017-09-19
by an official record. See id. at 714-15. As a result, the court concluded “[t]hat a hearing de novo is more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5678 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Tammy Ankomeus v. Mary Irving
as to whether and when the policy cancellation became effective. The summary judgment record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5269 - 2017-09-19
as to whether and when the policy cancellation became effective. The summary judgment record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5269 - 2017-09-19
Tyrone Hill v. Dean Medical Center
. To the contrary, the record suggests that being present for the questioning of Dr. James Stoll, another expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11625 - 2005-03-31
. To the contrary, the record suggests that being present for the questioning of Dr. James Stoll, another expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11625 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in reaching a decision that is reasonable. Raz, 260 Wis. 2d 614, ¶15. The record and the law support summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35464 - 2009-02-10
in reaching a decision that is reasonable. Raz, 260 Wis. 2d 614, ¶15. The record and the law support summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35464 - 2009-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record, and he knew the court routinely read the documents in the record before sentencing. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12
the record, and he knew the court routinely read the documents in the record before sentencing. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
of the testimony of other witnesses at other hearings when the entire record [was] examined.” Id., ¶58. Nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65478 - 2011-06-08
of the testimony of other witnesses at other hearings when the entire record [was] examined.” Id., ¶58. Nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65478 - 2011-06-08
[PDF]
State v. Bashar Elramahi
, and the defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence disputed. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14239 - 2014-09-15
, and the defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence disputed. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14239 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jennifer A. Croop v. Tom A. Sweeney
-0763 2 injunction. Upon reviewing the record,1 we are satisfied there was sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15289 - 2017-09-21
-0763 2 injunction. Upon reviewing the record,1 we are satisfied there was sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15289 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
of which are distinguishable from the facts of record here. In Garrity, the Supreme Court held that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7546 - 2017-09-19
of which are distinguishable from the facts of record here. In Garrity, the Supreme Court held that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7546 - 2017-09-19