Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 28271 - 28280 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying his motion to suppress the controlled substances found on his person following his arrest, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43838 - 2009-11-23
in denying his motion to suppress the controlled substances found on his person following his arrest, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43838 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
State v. Terrance J. W.
. Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ. MYSE, J. Terrance W. appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10131 - 2017-09-19
. Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ. MYSE, J. Terrance W. appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10131 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the controlled substances found on his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43838 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the controlled substances found on his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43838 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postdisposition motion to vacate the order for commitment because, according to T. B., the circuit court “lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149581 - 2017-09-21
postdisposition motion to vacate the order for commitment because, according to T. B., the circuit court “lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149581 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher D. Laurin
for denying Laurin’s motion to suppress. The officer did not pursue Laurin into his home. He went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2507 - 2017-09-19
for denying Laurin’s motion to suppress. The officer did not pursue Laurin into his home. He went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2507 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Immel contends that the court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence derived from the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062911 - 2026-01-21
. Immel contends that the court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence derived from the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062911 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, pro se, appeals a trial court order denying his postconviction motion brought under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112563 - 2017-09-21
, pro se, appeals a trial court order denying his postconviction motion brought under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112563 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime, see Wis. Stat. §§ 943.32(2) & 939.05, and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126712 - 2014-11-11
to a crime, see Wis. Stat. §§ 943.32(2) & 939.05, and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126712 - 2014-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82806 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82806 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2009. ¶3 Approximately one year later, in July 2010, the Town filed a motion for contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108965 - 2014-03-10
, 2009. ¶3 Approximately one year later, in July 2010, the Town filed a motion for contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108965 - 2014-03-10