Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28391 - 28400 of 29823 for des.
Search results 28391 - 28400 of 29823 for des.
Donald Urban v. David Grasser
to undisputed facts. Interpretation of this statute presents a question of law that we decide de novo, while
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17498 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts. Interpretation of this statute presents a question of law that we decide de novo, while
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17498 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135726 - 2015-02-25
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135726 - 2015-02-25
Brown County v. Kathy C.
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2691 - 2005-03-31
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2691 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven A. Harvey
to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995). Whether the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21574 - 2006-02-23
to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995). Whether the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21574 - 2006-02-23
2007 WI App 244
.3, 520 N.W.2d 625 (Ct. App. 1994) (noting that although “review is de novo, the rationale underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30669 - 2007-11-27
.3, 520 N.W.2d 625 (Ct. App. 1994) (noting that although “review is de novo, the rationale underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30669 - 2007-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶28, __ Wis. 2d __, 734 N.W.2d 115 (This court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30366 - 2007-09-24
review de novo. See State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶28, __ Wis. 2d __, 734 N.W.2d 115 (This court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30366 - 2007-09-24
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bruce B. Jacobson
of law and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis. 2d 117
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16612 - 2005-03-31
of law and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis. 2d 117
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16612 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew J. Trecroci
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2519 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2519 - 2005-03-31
Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
which this court reviews de novo. See City of West Allis v. Sheedy, 211 Wis. 2d 92, 96, 564 N.W.2d 708
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17085 - 2005-03-31
which this court reviews de novo. See City of West Allis v. Sheedy, 211 Wis. 2d 92, 96, 564 N.W.2d 708
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17085 - 2005-03-31
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31
was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31