Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2841 - 2850 of 15277 for 2013.
Search results 2841 - 2850 of 15277 for 2013.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 18, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98183 - 2013-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 18, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98183 - 2013-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
claim pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 101.11 (2013-14).[1] The Seamonsons filed a petition for leave to appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141316 - 2015-05-06
claim pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 101.11 (2013-14).[1] The Seamonsons filed a petition for leave to appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141316 - 2015-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appealed, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction in May 2013. ¶4 Howlett brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150573 - 2017-09-21
appealed, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction in May 2013. ¶4 Howlett brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150573 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Reinders owns residential property abutting Upper Nashotah Lake. In 2013, Reinders decided to subdivide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171900 - 2017-09-21
Reinders owns residential property abutting Upper Nashotah Lake. In 2013, Reinders decided to subdivide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171900 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm the orders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166542 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm the orders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166542 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
(2013-14)[3] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Chapman filed a response. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139181 - 2015-04-01
(2013-14)[3] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Chapman filed a response. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139181 - 2015-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182012 - 2017-09-21
for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182012 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se motion to eliminate the DNA surcharge. That motion was denied. In 2013, Sanders filed a pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208260 - 2018-02-13
se motion to eliminate the DNA surcharge. That motion was denied. In 2013, Sanders filed a pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208260 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2013, Attorney Mitz sent PS Finance a check in the amount of $11,637, the full balance due
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139097 - 2017-09-21
2013, Attorney Mitz sent PS Finance a check in the amount of $11,637, the full balance due
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139097 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140534 - 2017-09-21
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140534 - 2017-09-21