Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 69092 for he.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 69092 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Johnson
his restitution obligation to the insurer of the local business he was convicted of burglarizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19351 - 2017-09-21
his restitution obligation to the insurer of the local business he was convicted of burglarizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19351 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Joy M. Winkler v. Robert W. Winkler
-nine years old and was a long-time employee of Milwaukee County. Although he was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17872 - 2017-09-21
-nine years old and was a long-time employee of Milwaukee County. Although he was eligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17872 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George Smith
even though he or she simultaneously claims to be innocent.); State v. Garcia, ___ Wis.2d ___, 532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8233 - 2017-09-19
even though he or she simultaneously claims to be innocent.); State v. Garcia, ___ Wis.2d ___, 532
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8233 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark R. Johnson
to reduce his restitution obligation to the insurer of the local business he was convicted of burglarizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19351 - 2005-09-19
to reduce his restitution obligation to the insurer of the local business he was convicted of burglarizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19351 - 2005-09-19
State v. Ralph E. Adams
, and he questions the propriety of the assistant district attorney’s closing argument. We reject Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12710 - 2005-03-31
, and he questions the propriety of the assistant district attorney’s closing argument. We reject Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12710 - 2005-03-31
H. Elaine Stipetich v. William J. Grosshans
claim under § 1983 that he had violated her constitutional right to privacy. We agree that Tupper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15443 - 2005-03-31
claim under § 1983 that he had violated her constitutional right to privacy. We agree that Tupper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15443 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
voluntarily released her from the chokehold, but he then slapped her on the side of the face, grabbed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393020 - 2021-07-20
voluntarily released her from the chokehold, but he then slapped her on the side of the face, grabbed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393020 - 2021-07-20
[PDF]
H. Elaine Stipetich v. William J. Grosshans
of the order denying summary judgment on Stipetich’s claim under § 1983 that he had violated her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15443 - 2017-09-21
of the order denying summary judgment on Stipetich’s claim under § 1983 that he had violated her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15443 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision was necessary to protect the public. He further asserts that a court’s explanation for its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250034 - 2019-11-13
supervision was necessary to protect the public. He further asserts that a court’s explanation for its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250034 - 2019-11-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. He argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987430 - 2025-07-23
denying his postconviction motion. He argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987430 - 2025-07-23