Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 38464 for t's.
Search results 28661 - 28670 of 38464 for t's.
[PDF]
State v. Lloyd Edwin Sellers
informed of the Miranda rights, understood them, and knowingly and intelligently waived them. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10976 - 2017-09-19
informed of the Miranda rights, understood them, and knowingly and intelligently waived them. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N.F.
by the prosecutor. Then the court said: “[T]he Court will find that the testimony that was given in open court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6376 - 2017-09-19
by the prosecutor. Then the court said: “[T]he Court will find that the testimony that was given in open court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6376 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Norlander
and therefore irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial. The circuit court concluded: [T]he state can put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18379 - 2017-09-21
and therefore irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial. The circuit court concluded: [T]he state can put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. Rosin, Respondent. FILED APR 25, 2023 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648333 - 2023-04-25
. Rosin, Respondent. FILED APR 25, 2023 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Supreme Court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648333 - 2023-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 30, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213522 - 2018-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 30, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213522 - 2018-05-30
State v. Cynthia S.
), Cynthia argues that “[t]he [plea] colloquy was perfunctory.” She contends: “[N]one of the questioners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
), Cynthia argues that “[t]he [plea] colloquy was perfunctory.” She contends: “[N]one of the questioners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deondre J. Kelley
members, and remarked that “[t]he odds of getting off this stuff are about 20 percent.” Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7424 - 2005-03-31
members, and remarked that “[t]he odds of getting off this stuff are about 20 percent.” Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7424 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
income and assets,” it found that this knowledge was limited, adding that “[t]here is no indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750564 - 2024-01-18
income and assets,” it found that this knowledge was limited, adding that “[t]here is no indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750564 - 2024-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for judicial bias because “[t]here is a presumption that a judge has acted fairly, impartially, and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978749 - 2025-07-03
for judicial bias because “[t]here is a presumption that a judge has acted fairly, impartially, and without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978749 - 2025-07-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 164 (Ct. App. 1998) (Ratification is “[t]he affirmance by a person of a prior act which did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63749 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 164 (Ct. App. 1998) (Ratification is “[t]he affirmance by a person of a prior act which did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63749 - 2014-09-15