Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2881 - 2890 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2881 - 2890 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. Racine Cnty. v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70058 - 2011-08-22
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70058 - 2011-08-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 236-37. ¶6 Neuaone’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27102 - 2014-09-15
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 236-37. ¶6 Neuaone’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27102 - 2014-09-15
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
, whether a settlement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
, whether a settlement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
Ruth M. Erickson v. Alvin Zimmerman
,[1] our review is de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d 773
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13872 - 2005-03-31
,[1] our review is de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d 773
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13872 - 2005-03-31
County of Green Lake v. Paul J. Mertz
are mandatory.[5] This presents a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18269 - 2005-05-24
are mandatory.[5] This presents a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18269 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court issued an order concluding that “the execution of the real property [was] a de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258243 - 2020-04-21
The circuit court issued an order concluding that “the execution of the real property [was] a de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258243 - 2020-04-21
[PDF]
Cynthia Hoffman v. Economy Preferred Insurance Company
and awarded actual costs. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 We review orders granting summary judgment de novo using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15288 - 2017-09-21
and awarded actual costs. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 We review orders granting summary judgment de novo using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15288 - 2017-09-21
City of Brookfield v. Daniel D. Ulmen
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3624 - 2005-03-31
to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3624 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Viola Leimbach v. Martin A. Kummer
of the motion for summary judgment. ¶9 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6041 - 2017-09-19
of the motion for summary judgment. ¶9 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6041 - 2017-09-19