Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28841 - 28850 of 32555 for r's.
Search results 28841 - 28850 of 32555 for r's.
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2020
an order by the Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Judge Joseph R. Wall, presiding, which requires
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292469 - 2020-09-25
an order by the Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Judge Joseph R. Wall, presiding, which requires
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292469 - 2020-09-25
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 3 & 14, 2019
judgment of conviction, Judge Dennis R. Cimpl, presiding, that was entered upon Charles L. Neill’s guilty
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247728 - 2019-09-26
judgment of conviction, Judge Dennis R. Cimpl, presiding, that was entered upon Charles L. Neill’s guilty
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247728 - 2019-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial because it confused the issues at trial. Specifically, Wendt argues that “[r]easonable jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987742 - 2025-07-24
was prejudicial because it confused the issues at trial. Specifically, Wendt argues that “[r]easonable jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987742 - 2025-07-24
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
of Trempealeau, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mike R. Mikrut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4768 - 2005-03-31
of Trempealeau, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mike R. Mikrut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4768 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that termination was in Holly’s best interests. See Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152-53, 551 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934263 - 2025-04-02
that termination was in Holly’s best interests. See Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152-53, 551 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934263 - 2025-04-02
[PDF]
State v. Bradley Alan St. George
test, the issue is whether the prior act was clearly relevant to a material issue. “[R]elevance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3159 - 2017-09-19
test, the issue is whether the prior act was clearly relevant to a material issue. “[R]elevance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3159 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
David C. Myers v. Daren Swenson
of the circuit court for Dane County: DANIEL R. MOESER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Deininger, P.J., Dykman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6858 - 2017-09-20
of the circuit court for Dane County: DANIEL R. MOESER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Deininger, P.J., Dykman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6858 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. American Girl, Inc.
and Michael R. Vescio of Mingo & Yankala, S.C., Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4171 - 2017-09-19
and Michael R. Vescio of Mingo & Yankala, S.C., Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4171 - 2017-09-19
Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
-respondent The Travelers Indemnity Company, the cause was submitted on the brief of Barry R. Ostrager, David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3923 - 2005-03-31
-respondent The Travelers Indemnity Company, the cause was submitted on the brief of Barry R. Ostrager, David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3923 - 2005-03-31
Robert A. Bruner, Sr. v. Heritage Companies
Leavell and Michael R.. Vescio of Jeffrey Leavell, S.C. of Racine. There were oral arguments by Jeffrey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13288 - 2005-03-31
Leavell and Michael R.. Vescio of Jeffrey Leavell, S.C. of Racine. There were oral arguments by Jeffrey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13288 - 2005-03-31