Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28991 - 29000 of 73914 for public records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court disagreed with the County’s position and dismissed the citation. Based upon the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208352 - 2018-02-14

State v. Sean A.
the testimony of the detective as to J.S.’s statement. The record should show that discretion was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12654 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State of Wisconsin v. Gale D. Nelson
indicating the severity of the charges against him, and that virtually every member of the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25964 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and Joel Nettesheim, a certified public accountant called by the Minority Shareholders as an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746641 - 2024-01-03

COURT OF APPEALS
interest in the corporation. ¶18 Upon remand, the circuit court reviewed the record and the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141531 - 2015-05-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was altered and may have looked “odd” to Wilson, the only evidence in the record is that no one other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97787 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a privately-held electric public utility. In 1959, it purchased the Grimh Dam, a hydroelectric dam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97054 - 2014-09-15

State v. Harrison Franklin
forth in the record its reasons for the restraints.” Id. at 409-10. Although as a general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16178 - 2005-03-31

Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
. Further, we find no support in the record for Affeldt’s allegations that the circuit court was not capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11916 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 24, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
, and that the record fails to reveal an alternate factual basis on which to sustain the injunction. We further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33496 - 2008-07-23