Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2911 - 2920 of 38410 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Pemborong Interior Kamar Anak Laki-Laki Apartemen Margonda Residence III Depok.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
he lived as a “single-family residence” and that there was no probable cause to search both units
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857750 - 2024-10-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a disturbance, officers were dispatched to the duplex where Basterash resided. Upon arriving, officers met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198822 - 2017-10-26

[PDF] NOTICE
. We agree with the circuit court that the officer’s entry into Lindert’s residence was justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29587 - 2014-09-15

State v. Brett M. Champagne
garbage bags from plastic garbage cans located in the alley area behind Champagne’s residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4458 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lamont D. Tate
be set aside because the search of his residence was based upon a warrant that was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15888 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Peggy A. Hampton
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 99-0662-CR 2 inside her residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21

State v. Peggy A. Hampton
erred by failing to suppress the results of field sobriety tests given inside her residence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31

Beverly Hayen v. Barry Hayen
of her residence. We agree with both of Beverly’s contentions. Accordingly, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15558 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Beverly Hayen v. Barry Hayen
in physical possession of her residence. We agree with both of Beverly’s contentions. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15558 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2013FA364 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III IN RE THE MARRIAGE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185952 - 2017-09-21