Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29241 - 29250 of 97593 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29241 - 29250 of 97593 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing, held just twenty-one days before Rowan’s initial appearance in the present case.[4] The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71316 - 2011-09-26
at sentencing, held just twenty-one days before Rowan’s initial appearance in the present case.[4] The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71316 - 2011-09-26
Milwaukee County v. Theodore S.
. STEINMETZ, J. The issue in this case is whether the circuit court has the authority to review probable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16985 - 2005-03-31
. STEINMETZ, J. The issue in this case is whether the circuit court has the authority to review probable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16985 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee County v. Louise M.
. STEINMETZ, J. The issue in this case is whether the circuit court has the authority to review probable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16984 - 2005-03-31
. STEINMETZ, J. The issue in this case is whether the circuit court has the authority to review probable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16984 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the circuit court for an award of sanctions against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99529 - 2013-07-23
in part, reverse in part, and remand the case to the circuit court for an award of sanctions against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99529 - 2013-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
Wisconsin case to consider the issue of a jury being coerced by the actions of the court. See id. at 667
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28476 - 2007-04-23
Wisconsin case to consider the issue of a jury being coerced by the actions of the court. See id. at 667
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28476 - 2007-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. …. I think when I look at this particular case before me … the Court is going to deny that request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139585 - 2015-04-13
. …. I think when I look at this particular case before me … the Court is going to deny that request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139585 - 2015-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the case was scheduled for trial. ¶3 Prior to trial, the State moved the court for an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48121 - 2010-03-17
, and the case was scheduled for trial. ¶3 Prior to trial, the State moved the court for an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48121 - 2010-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 16, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36188 - 2009-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 16, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36188 - 2009-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. ¶17 Given the narrow standard of review, this court is satisfied the jury could form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123444 - 2014-10-06
in this case. ¶17 Given the narrow standard of review, this court is satisfied the jury could form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123444 - 2014-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that the municipal court should have admitted into evidence, and in some manner enforced in this case, two written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101631 - 2013-09-04
that the municipal court should have admitted into evidence, and in some manner enforced in this case, two written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101631 - 2013-09-04