Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29351 - 29360 of 62078 for child support.
Search results 29351 - 29360 of 62078 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
become dangerous to himself if treatment were withdrawn. In support of this opinion, Coates testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587783 - 2022-11-08
become dangerous to himself if treatment were withdrawn. In support of this opinion, Coates testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587783 - 2022-11-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
revocation was supported by the record and then ordered the amount of reconfinement time increased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256129 - 2020-03-10
revocation was supported by the record and then ordered the amount of reconfinement time increased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256129 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
based on alleged newly discovered evidence. In support, he offered an affidavit from John averring
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378442 - 2021-06-22
based on alleged newly discovered evidence. In support, he offered an affidavit from John averring
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378442 - 2021-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
-08).[1] She appeals, asserting that the trial evidence was insufficient to support her conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26
-08).[1] She appeals, asserting that the trial evidence was insufficient to support her conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
Richard Winters v. Gary R. McCaughtry
of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact, so long as the fact is supported by substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7471 - 2017-09-20
of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact, so long as the fact is supported by substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7471 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
raised three claims: (1) there was “insufficient evidence to support a finding of guilt because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713865 - 2023-10-17
raised three claims: (1) there was “insufficient evidence to support a finding of guilt because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713865 - 2023-10-17
Jami L. Van Boxtel v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
the validity of the agreement. He presented evidence to support his position that he was pressured and rushed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17480 - 2005-03-31
the validity of the agreement. He presented evidence to support his position that he was pressured and rushed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17480 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reference “part i” in support of their assertion that Northern Bridges had a ministerial duty to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144509 - 2015-07-19
reference “part i” in support of their assertion that Northern Bridges had a ministerial duty to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144509 - 2015-07-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that is necessary for our review, supports the [trial] court’s determination.” See id. Therefore, we will assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
that is necessary for our review, supports the [trial] court’s determination.” See id. Therefore, we will assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
Linda Kallas as Guardian for Ruth M. Radtke v.
opposition to the testamentary documents. Yentz asserted there was no evidence to support the claim of undue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5707 - 2005-03-31
opposition to the testamentary documents. Yentz asserted there was no evidence to support the claim of undue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5707 - 2005-03-31