Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2941 - 2950 of 6963 for a u.

State v. Corrina L. Deichsel
in the instigation or planning of the assault. Nevertheless, it commented that “[u]nder such a circumstance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6404 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
attention to a portion of his motion where he alleged: [u]nderstanding th[e] sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88220 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] LaVerne T. Yatso v. James E. Auer, M.D.
to obtain her consent for her husband’s autopsy. Dr. Auer disagrees, noting that “[u]nder the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15561 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Farrah E. Lott
to facilitate the transportation, sale, or secretion of controlled substances. …. u. Your complainant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7096 - 2017-09-20

Michael Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Commission
“[u]pon the evidence” before the Board there was “just cause” under the listed criteria “to sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Bank of New York v. David H. Mills
. In support of its decision, the court explained: [U]nder the circumstances, I think that looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6502 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rolando M. Tong
by the preference to be accorded to warrants.” U. S. v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 109 (1965). It has been said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12964 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Eric D.B. v. Denise L.B.
doing, it observed that “[u]nfortunately, this has been a bitter child custody matter for years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2390 - 2017-09-19

State v. Joseph Williams
counterpart to our loan sharking law and federal case law interpreting it, we noted that “[u]nder 18 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31

Martha S. Steil v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
Steil also argues that “[u]ntil the amendment of § 49.453, there were no established criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3003 - 2005-03-31