Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29431 - 29440 of 81911 for simple case.
Search results 29431 - 29440 of 81911 for simple case.
[PDF]
NOTICE
need not reach this issue. See State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, 492, 570 N.W.2d 44 (1997) (cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56222 - 2014-09-15
need not reach this issue. See State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, 492, 570 N.W.2d 44 (1997) (cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-18).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
-18).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
or previously,” and claims that the sentence in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
or previously,” and claims that the sentence in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darrell C. Solfest
. Although Solfest seeks approval from this court to vacate his plea, the issue presented by this case is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12201 - 2005-03-31
. Although Solfest seeks approval from this court to vacate his plea, the issue presented by this case is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12201 - 2005-03-31
State v. Floyd A. Worth
the trial court’s imposition of probation in this case. Maintaining that he did indeed reject probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13191 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s imposition of probation in this case. Maintaining that he did indeed reject probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13191 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not be applied retroactively, and because Riverside does not apply when the defendant, as in the case at hand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32128 - 2008-03-17
not be applied retroactively, and because Riverside does not apply when the defendant, as in the case at hand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32128 - 2008-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
cooperation. ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63727 - 2011-05-09
cooperation. ¶4 Trial counsel’s sentencing argument highlighted “positives” in Patterson’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63727 - 2011-05-09
State v. Joshua Jenkins
not been stopped. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
not been stopped. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
[PDF]
State v. James M. Smith
requested the trial court to appoint counsel and expressed a desire to dispose of the case. Smith wrote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8273 - 2017-09-19
requested the trial court to appoint counsel and expressed a desire to dispose of the case. Smith wrote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8273 - 2017-09-19