Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29541 - 29550 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 29541 - 29550 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Michael Vines
postverdict motion,[2] Vines claims that the record excerpted above “failed to establish the habitual criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9906 - 2005-03-31
postverdict motion,[2] Vines claims that the record excerpted above “failed to establish the habitual criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9906 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
in this matter. The no-merit report addresses a single issue: whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118589 - 2014-08-05
in this matter. The no-merit report addresses a single issue: whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118589 - 2014-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS
guaranty and the appropriate amount of his liability. We reject Pope’s claim and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91316 - 2013-01-08
guaranty and the appropriate amount of his liability. We reject Pope’s claim and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91316 - 2013-01-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment requiring him to pay restitution.2 He claims the circuit court erred in refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791459 - 2024-04-24
from a judgment requiring him to pay restitution.2 He claims the circuit court erred in refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791459 - 2024-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Jonathan Lisowski appeals an order dismissing his claim against Hastings Mutual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31687 - 2008-01-30
PER CURIAM. Jonathan Lisowski appeals an order dismissing his claim against Hastings Mutual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31687 - 2008-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
court lacked jurisdiction over his case.[1] ¶5 We conclude Jackson’s claims fail because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113855 - 2014-06-09
court lacked jurisdiction over his case.[1] ¶5 We conclude Jackson’s claims fail because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113855 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Senkbeil’s post-plea claims of confusion do not square with his failure to communicate it, his statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124147 - 2017-09-21
. Senkbeil’s post-plea claims of confusion do not square with his failure to communicate it, his statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth L. Hooverson, Jr.
relief. Hooverson claims there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14705 - 2017-09-21
relief. Hooverson claims there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14705 - 2017-09-21
June Remick v. James D. Cady
to be the custodian of the cremated remains of James Wrosch (Wrosch or the decedent). The next of kin claim the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16332 - 2005-03-31
to be the custodian of the cremated remains of James Wrosch (Wrosch or the decedent). The next of kin claim the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16332 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jude G. Trautlein
from a traffic stop. He claims the police did not verify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25103 - 2017-09-21
from a traffic stop. He claims the police did not verify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25103 - 2017-09-21