Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29661 - 29670 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29661 - 29670 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion and admitted improperly seized evidence at trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 While on patrol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50231 - 2014-09-15
motion and admitted improperly seized evidence at trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 While on patrol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50231 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Appointed appellate No. 2020AP1428-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352511 - 2021-04-06
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Appointed appellate No. 2020AP1428-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352511 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concentration (PAC) as a fourth offense. He filed a motion collaterally attacking two of his prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08
concentration (PAC) as a fourth offense. He filed a motion collaterally attacking two of his prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08
State v. David Mikel
., and from an order denying his sentence modification motion. Mikel received a ten-year sentence after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12419 - 2005-03-31
., and from an order denying his sentence modification motion. Mikel received a ten-year sentence after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12419 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cleveland R. Barnes
the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2005-03-31
the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for reconsideration. Indymac argues that it established excusable neglect for failing to timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42688 - 2009-10-27
motion for reconsideration. Indymac argues that it established excusable neglect for failing to timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42688 - 2009-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Giegler
as a party to the crime and as a habitual criminal, and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2862 - 2017-09-19
as a party to the crime and as a habitual criminal, and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2862 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
enhancer under Wis. Stat. § 939.645(1) and (2)(a).[3] The defendant filed a motion to dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36528 - 2009-05-18
enhancer under Wis. Stat. § 939.645(1) and (2)(a).[3] The defendant filed a motion to dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36528 - 2009-05-18
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of Thornton’s father, Thomas. Thornton also filed a motion for abeyance so that he could retain legal counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026288 - 2025-10-22
of Thornton’s father, Thomas. Thornton also filed a motion for abeyance so that he could retain legal counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026288 - 2025-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
for possessing a firearm as a felon to challenge an order denying his suppression motion. Simmons did not yield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35651 - 2009-02-23
for possessing a firearm as a felon to challenge an order denying his suppression motion. Simmons did not yield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35651 - 2009-02-23