Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29751 - 29760 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29751 - 29760 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
’ stipulation in the present case, or the relevant fee-shifting statutes, required the court to award a certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
’ stipulation in the present case, or the relevant fee-shifting statutes, required the court to award a certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 18, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31184 - 2007-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 18, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31184 - 2007-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 15, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32441 - 2005-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 15, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32441 - 2005-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 16, 2010 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47973 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 16, 2010 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47973 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 6, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90209 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 6, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90209 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief. ¶2 Lale was convicted in this case pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72447 - 2011-10-25
the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief. ¶2 Lale was convicted in this case pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72447 - 2011-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, the Alabama Supreme Court distinguished these cases, explaining: In those cases, the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112357 - 2014-05-12
. However, the Alabama Supreme Court distinguished these cases, explaining: In those cases, the children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112357 - 2014-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
this case went to trial and is procedural in nature. The trial court held the statute applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13
this case went to trial and is procedural in nature. The trial court held the statute applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100732 - 2013-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100732 - 2013-09-25