Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29771 - 29780 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29771 - 29780 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 19, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137823 - 2015-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 19, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137823 - 2015-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case.” On the possession of cocaine charge, the court imposed a concurrent sentence of two-and-one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61077 - 2011-03-14
in this case.” On the possession of cocaine charge, the court imposed a concurrent sentence of two-and-one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61077 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
facie case for summary judgment, the court examines the affidavits submitted by the opposing party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50325 - 2010-07-21
facie case for summary judgment, the court examines the affidavits submitted by the opposing party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50325 - 2010-07-21
[PDF]
A.O. Smith Corporation v. Allstate Insurance Companies
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3496 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11801 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3496 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11801 - 2014-09-15
A.O. Smith Corporation v. Allstate Insurance Companies
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11801 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11801 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. This case involves a challenge to the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees. The appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
CURIAM. This case involves a challenge to the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees. The appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
to a direct appeal in two Milwaukee County circuit court cases. We conclude that Baldwin’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26
to a direct appeal in two Milwaukee County circuit court cases. We conclude that Baldwin’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that a circuit court may not direct a verdict in a traffic forfeiture case. Turner apparently means to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30119 - 2007-08-29
that a circuit court may not direct a verdict in a traffic forfeiture case. Turner apparently means to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30119 - 2007-08-29
City of Milwaukee v. Michael A. Bell
and supplies the trial court with the necessary underpinnings to prove the fact to be judicially noticed, case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16040 - 2005-03-31
and supplies the trial court with the necessary underpinnings to prove the fact to be judicially noticed, case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16040 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Michael A. Bell
, case law has long held that a trial court has discretion to decide whether to take judicial notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16040 - 2017-09-21
, case law has long held that a trial court has discretion to decide whether to take judicial notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16040 - 2017-09-21