Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29791 - 29800 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29791 - 29800 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
was serving on the case. ¶22 The trial court initially indicated it thought Juror 2 could be struck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88167 - 2012-10-15
was serving on the case. ¶22 The trial court initially indicated it thought Juror 2 could be struck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88167 - 2012-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
are distinguishable. Richey cites several cases for the proposition that a court should not accept a jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137606 - 2015-04-08
are distinguishable. Richey cites several cases for the proposition that a court should not accept a jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137606 - 2015-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 13, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 13, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS
made the case “unable to proceed forward.” The circuit court did not find that “there is excusable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116168 - 2014-07-07
made the case “unable to proceed forward.” The circuit court did not find that “there is excusable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116168 - 2014-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91731 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91731 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
suspensions was still pending and could not be used against him in the instant case. The court held a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
suspensions was still pending and could not be used against him in the instant case. The court held a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32021 - 2008-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
six months, the case would be dismissed. Szymczak failed to comply with the trial court order. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31841 - 2008-02-19
six months, the case would be dismissed. Szymczak failed to comply with the trial court order. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31841 - 2008-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
’ stipulation in the present case, or the relevant fee-shifting statutes, required the court to award a certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
’ stipulation in the present case, or the relevant fee-shifting statutes, required the court to award a certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 18, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31184 - 2007-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 18, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31184 - 2007-12-17