Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29791 - 29800 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29791 - 29800 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
could not prove her case. After hearing the matter the trial court found that the repairs done while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37722 - 2009-07-15
could not prove her case. After hearing the matter the trial court found that the repairs done while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37722 - 2009-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the case for failure to prosecute. At the hearing on that motion, the circuit court observed that Lazy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99971 - 2013-07-30
the case for failure to prosecute. At the hearing on that motion, the circuit court observed that Lazy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99971 - 2013-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
the municipal court’s judgment because the case was resolved by way of a default judgment and no trial took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31589 - 2008-01-22
the municipal court’s judgment because the case was resolved by way of a default judgment and no trial took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31589 - 2008-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
is unable to attend.” In this case, the guardian ad litem made an oral statement to the court “asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85969 - 2012-08-08
is unable to attend.” In this case, the guardian ad litem made an oral statement to the court “asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85969 - 2012-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
and read in, along with an obstruction charge from another case. In October 2004, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76949 - 2012-01-23
and read in, along with an obstruction charge from another case. In October 2004, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76949 - 2012-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
that the Court was aware of the disposition of those – of those cases in juvenile court and my client
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74188 - 2011-11-21
that the Court was aware of the disposition of those – of those cases in juvenile court and my client
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74188 - 2011-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for further guidance, as Matel would have this court do. Service by mail in this case, coupled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64697 - 2011-05-23
for further guidance, as Matel would have this court do. Service by mail in this case, coupled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64697 - 2011-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.29(1) (2011-12),[1] to compel settlement of the case on Northland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93778 - 2013-03-06
court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.29(1) (2011-12),[1] to compel settlement of the case on Northland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93778 - 2013-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
of the original complaint.”[3] The court also addressed some of the trial testimony in the case and concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139718 - 2015-04-14
of the original complaint.”[3] The court also addressed some of the trial testimony in the case and concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139718 - 2015-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
. That was the situation in this case. We find none of the juvenile court’s projections to be unreasonable or based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15
. That was the situation in this case. We find none of the juvenile court’s projections to be unreasonable or based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15