Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29861 - 29870 of 57201 for id.
Search results 29861 - 29870 of 57201 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
participation. See id. When sentencing a person who is not statutorily disqualified, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947932 - 2025-04-30
participation. See id. When sentencing a person who is not statutorily disqualified, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947932 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on behalf of six justices) (“[H]indsight cannot constitutionally be employed to justify a pat-down.”); Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74744 - 2014-09-15
on behalf of six justices) (“[H]indsight cannot constitutionally be employed to justify a pat-down.”); Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74744 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Id. ¶8 A court begins with the presumption that property should be divided equally. WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57551 - 2014-09-15
. Id. ¶8 A court begins with the presumption that property should be divided equally. WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57551 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald R. MacClymont v. Harriet J. Gilligan
novo. Id. at 328, 525 N.W.2d at 98. David argues that Harriet provided only personal services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8768 - 2017-09-19
novo. Id. at 328, 525 N.W.2d at 98. David argues that Harriet provided only personal services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8768 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Miguel A. Segarra
interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 207-08. “A pat down, or ‘frisk,’ is a search” within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6828 - 2017-09-20
interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 207-08. “A pat down, or ‘frisk,’ is a search” within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6828 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
disorder. Id., ¶2. We rejected this argument. Id., ¶20. Under Smalley, even if actuarial instruments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31247 - 2007-12-17
disorder. Id., ¶2. We rejected this argument. Id., ¶20. Under Smalley, even if actuarial instruments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31247 - 2007-12-17
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
of probable cause may rest. Id. The trial court found that probable cause to arrest existed absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
of probable cause may rest. Id. The trial court found that probable cause to arrest existed absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
Tracy Berginz-Graef v. Stephanie E. Lamon
whether the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id., 165 Wis.2d at 320 n.1, 477 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11481 - 2005-03-31
whether the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id., 165 Wis.2d at 320 n.1, 477 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11481 - 2005-03-31
Robert Macemon v. Jessica Christie
of whether the facts as determined warrant revocation.”[4] Id. at 488. Additionally, a right of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12173 - 2005-03-31
of whether the facts as determined warrant revocation.”[4] Id. at 488. Additionally, a right of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Vincent J. Longo
that we review de novo. See id. (quoting State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d 190, 191 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14875 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. See id. (quoting State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d 190, 191 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14875 - 2017-09-21