Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29881 - 29890 of 57351 for id.
Search results 29881 - 29890 of 57351 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
of venue, with a statement of fees. Id. Payment of change-of-venue fees is required prior to transmitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86384 - 2012-08-22
of venue, with a statement of fees. Id. Payment of change-of-venue fees is required prior to transmitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86384 - 2012-08-22
[PDF]
State v. Dean F. Bertrand
fines and forfeitures. See id. at 527, 489 N.W.2d at 665-66. In determining that Taylor’s HTO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12605 - 2017-09-21
fines and forfeitures. See id. at 527, 489 N.W.2d at 665-66. In determining that Taylor’s HTO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12605 - 2017-09-21
Lynn P. Adrian v. Gary E. Immel
that a reasonable judge could reach. See id. ¶7 “The trial court is required to calculate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2392 - 2005-03-31
that a reasonable judge could reach. See id. ¶7 “The trial court is required to calculate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2392 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
State v. Nilsa I. Huertas
factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27
factors, there is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. When the exercise of discretion has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27
State v. Daniel T. Raymond
, the reviewing court must accept the inference drawn by the trier of fact. Id. at 643-44.[2] ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5301 - 2005-03-31
, the reviewing court must accept the inference drawn by the trier of fact. Id. at 643-44.[2] ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5301 - 2005-03-31
State v. Teng Vang
for defendant’s change of heart other than the desire to have a trial.” Id. (citation omitted). “The defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21456 - 2006-02-21
for defendant’s change of heart other than the desire to have a trial.” Id. (citation omitted). “The defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21456 - 2006-02-21
State v. Eric D. Gillespie
, upon a motion of any party for a hearing de novo. Id. (emphasis added). Specifically, Gillespie relies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7581 - 2005-03-31
, upon a motion of any party for a hearing de novo. Id. (emphasis added). Specifically, Gillespie relies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7581 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric Johnson
is reliable.” Id. Stated another way, to satisfy the prejudice-prong, Johnson must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12223 - 2005-03-31
is reliable.” Id. Stated another way, to satisfy the prejudice-prong, Johnson must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12223 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, permits his collateral challenge. See id., ¶¶24-27 (explaining that the failure of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497599 - 2022-03-22
, permits his collateral challenge. See id., ¶¶24-27 (explaining that the failure of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497599 - 2022-03-22