Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
Jimmy Bridges v. Gerald Berge
confinement. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 308.04(1) (June 1998). 1 Bridges was placed in temporary lock-up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4652 - 2017-09-19
confinement. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 308.04(1) (June 1998). 1 Bridges was placed in temporary lock-up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4652 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mary Kay McCallum v. Marathon County Board of Adjustment
to MARATHON COUNTY, WIS., ZONING CODE §17.08 (1998), “special exception” is defined as follows: “Uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4015 - 2017-09-20
to MARATHON COUNTY, WIS., ZONING CODE §17.08 (1998), “special exception” is defined as follows: “Uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4015 - 2017-09-20
Mary Kay McCallum v. Marathon County Board of Adjustment
in compliance with the intent of the code. The Board can deny a special exception permit. I think in a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4015 - 2014-08-19
in compliance with the intent of the code. The Board can deny a special exception permit. I think in a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4015 - 2014-08-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
This case concerns a Department of Revenue assessment of sales and use taxes against Visu-Sewer. Visu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30503 - 2014-09-15
This case concerns a Department of Revenue assessment of sales and use taxes against Visu-Sewer. Visu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30503 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
real property construction activity. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns a Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
real property construction activity. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns a Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
[PDF]
WI App 48
) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which provides that: In a case referred to it, the Court of Criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191652 - 2018-08-22
) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which provides that: In a case referred to it, the Court of Criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191652 - 2018-08-22
[PDF]
is in the best interest of the child.” Sec. 767.451(1)(b)2.b. ¶18 In this case, Gregerson does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350816 - 2021-03-30
is in the best interest of the child.” Sec. 767.451(1)(b)2.b. ¶18 In this case, Gregerson does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350816 - 2021-03-30
Must a judge testify when subpoenaed?
case. The judge may be asked to testify as to facts and character. The judge is not hearing the case
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=903 - 2005-03-31
case. The judge may be asked to testify as to facts and character. The judge is not hearing the case
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=903 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Albert A. Tadych v. Waukesha County
. Tadych. As the case progressed, it became apparent that Attorney Tadych was going to be a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15668 - 2017-09-21
. Tadych. As the case progressed, it became apparent that Attorney Tadych was going to be a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15668 - 2017-09-21
Albert A. Tadych v. Waukesha County
, Attorney Albert R. Tadych. As the case progressed, it became apparent that Attorney Tadych was going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15165 - 2005-03-31
, Attorney Albert R. Tadych. As the case progressed, it became apparent that Attorney Tadych was going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15165 - 2005-03-31