Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 301 - 310 of 58338 for speedy trial.
Search results 301 - 310 of 58338 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
, violated his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 971.10 (2009-10),[1] and denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92112 - 2013-01-28
, violated his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 971.10 (2009-10),[1] and denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92112 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-representation, violated his statutory No. 2011AP2439-CR 2 right to a speedy trial pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92112 - 2014-09-15
-representation, violated his statutory No. 2011AP2439-CR 2 right to a speedy trial pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92112 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to file a speedy trial demand; (2) failing to adequately communicate with Carson; (2) failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101921 - 2017-09-21
to file a speedy trial demand; (2) failing to adequately communicate with Carson; (2) failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101921 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an arguably meritorious claim that he was denied a speedy trial. Both McDaniels and his appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246769 - 2019-09-12
an arguably meritorious claim that he was denied a speedy trial. Both McDaniels and his appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246769 - 2019-09-12
wi APp 80 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1514-CR Complete Title...
violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial; (3) counts one and two are multiplicitous; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96270 - 2014-03-09
violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial; (3) counts one and two are multiplicitous; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96270 - 2014-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not have lawful jurisdiction over his case, that his right to a speedy trial under WIS. STAT. § 971.10(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639572 - 2023-04-05
not have lawful jurisdiction over his case, that his right to a speedy trial under WIS. STAT. § 971.10(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639572 - 2023-04-05
[PDF]
State v. William Speener
to a speedy trial was violated; (5) failing to move for discovery, including failing to request the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14305 - 2014-09-15
to a speedy trial was violated; (5) failing to move for discovery, including failing to request the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14305 - 2014-09-15
State v. William Speener
to a speedy trial was violated; (5) failing to move for discovery, including failing to request the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14305 - 2005-03-31
to a speedy trial was violated; (5) failing to move for discovery, including failing to request the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14305 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and 18, 2023. Thereafter, Elst—although represented by counsel—filed a pro se speedy trial demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053778 - 2025-12-23
and 18, 2023. Thereafter, Elst—although represented by counsel—filed a pro se speedy trial demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053778 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and 18, 2023. Thereafter, Elst—although represented by counsel—filed a pro se speedy trial demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053778 - 2025-12-23
and 18, 2023. Thereafter, Elst—although represented by counsel—filed a pro se speedy trial demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053778 - 2025-12-23