Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 43184 for t o.
Search results 30011 - 30020 of 43184 for t o.
Wisconsin Department of Transportation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11677 - 2005-03-31
: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11677 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court for La Crosse County: dale t. pasell, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
court for La Crosse County: dale t. pasell, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
CA Blank Order
District IV April 20, 2015 To: Hon. Richard T. Werner Circuit Court Judge Rock Co. Courthouse 51
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140324 - 2015-04-19
District IV April 20, 2015 To: Hon. Richard T. Werner Circuit Court Judge Rock Co. Courthouse 51
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140324 - 2015-04-19
State v. Nathaniel S. Sherrod
and detained to allow the officer to “investigate the circumstances that provoke suspicion,” as long as “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12731 - 2005-03-31
and detained to allow the officer to “investigate the circumstances that provoke suspicion,” as long as “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12731 - 2005-03-31
State v. Garry P. Van De Voort
628, 633, 369 N.W.2d 711, 714 (1985). "[T]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10310 - 2005-03-31
628, 633, 369 N.W.2d 711, 714 (1985). "[T]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10310 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brad A. Peterson
County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11887 - 2017-09-21
County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J., Myse and Hoover, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11887 - 2017-09-21
Malcolm, Inc. v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
variance application on March 10, 2004, the supervisor stated the following: “[I]t is the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
variance application on March 10, 2004, the supervisor stated the following: “[I]t is the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
State v. Craig A. Sommer
that: [T]he enactment of Chapter 980 does not rise to the level of a “new factor” because Chapter 980 does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2008-05-19
that: [T]he enactment of Chapter 980 does not rise to the level of a “new factor” because Chapter 980 does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2008-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in detecting impaired drivers.” He asserts that “[i]t was unclear whether [the officer] was experienced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110586 - 2014-04-22
in detecting impaired drivers.” He asserts that “[i]t was unclear whether [the officer] was experienced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110586 - 2014-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2019-06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243061 - 2019-06-28
disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2019-06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243061 - 2019-06-28