Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30061 - 30070 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 30061 - 30070 of 65155 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
charges that Chand is subject to removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) as an “alien who at any time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130022 - 2014-11-24
charges that Chand is subject to removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) as an “alien who at any time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130022 - 2014-11-24
[PDF]
State v. Kweku Fitzpatrick
), STATS. 4 Sections 939.63(1)(a)2 and 939.62(1)(b), STATS. 5 Sections 941.20(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8525 - 2017-09-19
), STATS. 4 Sections 939.63(1)(a)2 and 939.62(1)(b), STATS. 5 Sections 941.20(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8525 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Diane M. Somers
Pointing to § 343.305(9)(b), STATS., which states that “use of the [Notice of Intent to Revoke] by a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
Pointing to § 343.305(9)(b), STATS., which states that “use of the [Notice of Intent to Revoke] by a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[b]y elevating a secondary sentencing factor, i.e. ‘the rehabilitative needs of the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204609 - 2017-12-05
that “[b]y elevating a secondary sentencing factor, i.e. ‘the rehabilitative needs of the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204609 - 2017-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
the commission” of the crime. See Wis. Stat. § 939.05(2)(b). Hills alleged that his plea was not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36850 - 2009-06-22
the commission” of the crime. See Wis. Stat. § 939.05(2)(b). Hills alleged that his plea was not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36850 - 2009-06-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 3 Hoak cites only WIS. STAT. § 971.23(1)(b), which applies to a written summary of his oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
. 3 Hoak cites only WIS. STAT. § 971.23(1)(b), which applies to a written summary of his oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Steven H. Hoyme v. Janice S. Brakken
in bad faith, solely for purposes of harassing or maliciously injuring another. (b) The party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
in bad faith, solely for purposes of harassing or maliciously injuring another. (b) The party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
WI App 144 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP653 Complete Title of...
, Plaintiffs, v. Sandra Ives, Defendant, ThedaCare, Inc. d/b/a ThedaCare Physicians
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72535 - 2013-04-23
, Plaintiffs, v. Sandra Ives, Defendant, ThedaCare, Inc. d/b/a ThedaCare Physicians
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72535 - 2013-04-23
State v. Edward Lee Hennings
of the incident. The trial court correctly analyzed this issue. It was not error to deny the motion.[1] B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12590 - 2005-03-31
of the incident. The trial court correctly analyzed this issue. It was not error to deny the motion.[1] B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12590 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Olds
driving. Deputy Becker read Olds Sections A and B of the Informing the Accused form, checking each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16115 - 2005-03-31
driving. Deputy Becker read Olds Sections A and B of the Informing the Accused form, checking each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16115 - 2005-03-31