Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30101 - 30110 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30101 - 30110 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Otis J. Martin
, and from the order denying him postconviction relief. He claims he was entitled to a hearing on his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
, and from the order denying him postconviction relief. He claims he was entitled to a hearing on his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
County of Jefferson v. Dale W. Prout
intoxicated, first offense, after the trial court denied his motion to suppress. Prout argues the Jefferson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7601 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated, first offense, after the trial court denied his motion to suppress. Prout argues the Jefferson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7601 - 2005-03-31
Shane C. Brickner v. Continental Casualty Company
Casualty Insurance Company. Larson also appeals from an order denying her motion to amend her complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10644 - 2005-03-31
Casualty Insurance Company. Larson also appeals from an order denying her motion to amend her complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the defendant.” WIS. STAT. § 948.01(5); WIS JI—CRIMINAL 2101A (May 2007). Torres filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157681 - 2017-09-21
the defendant.” WIS. STAT. § 948.01(5); WIS JI—CRIMINAL 2101A (May 2007). Torres filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157681 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. He argues: (1) the court erred when it answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73904 - 2011-11-14
denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. He argues: (1) the court erred when it answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73904 - 2011-11-14
2007 WI APP 33
of conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and an order denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27772 - 2007-02-27
of conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and an order denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27772 - 2007-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because it implied that Paul was a repeat offender. ¶7 The circuit court denied the mistrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
because it implied that Paul was a repeat offender. ¶7 The circuit court denied the mistrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and subsequent penalty enhancer. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
and subsequent penalty enhancer. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Blair C. Penchoff
in denying Penchoff’s motion to suppress evidence. Penchoff sought relief on the ground that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5474 - 2017-09-19
in denying Penchoff’s motion to suppress evidence. Penchoff sought relief on the ground that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5474 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas C. Smith
a judgment and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31
a judgment and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that his repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31