Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30101 - 30110 of 63537 for records.
Search results 30101 - 30110 of 63537 for records.
CA Blank Order
)(f). Upon consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131836 - 2014-12-22
)(f). Upon consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131836 - 2014-12-22
County of Winnebago v. Gary A. Burns
not save the appellate day for Burns because the trial court record nonetheless establishes a proper basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4648 - 2005-03-31
not save the appellate day for Burns because the trial court record nonetheless establishes a proper basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4648 - 2005-03-31
City of Sheboygan v. Jason R. Zimbal
party by the last name of Zimbal. A further record search revealed prior vehicle contact history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7309 - 2005-03-31
party by the last name of Zimbal. A further record search revealed prior vehicle contact history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7309 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record indicates that Ambort ever requested such information. If he is alleging that the City violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31754 - 2008-02-06
in the record indicates that Ambort ever requested such information. If he is alleging that the City violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31754 - 2008-02-06
State v. Russell Stokes
, that Knighten and Clark were alibi witnesses is supported by the record, and therefore, defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31
, that Knighten and Clark were alibi witnesses is supported by the record, and therefore, defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Durrah
of the record reveals that the postconviction decision can be found at exhibit 25 in the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2236 - 2017-09-19
of the record reveals that the postconviction decision can be found at exhibit 25 in the appellate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2236 - 2017-09-19
Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
be directed toward developing a record that is as complete as possible in order to facilitate subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31
be directed toward developing a record that is as complete as possible in order to facilitate subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31
Eau Claire County v. Tamara J. Knuth
. There is no indication in the record, however, that Knuth cited Renz to the trial court, or that she argued in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15480 - 2005-03-31
. There is no indication in the record, however, that Knuth cited Renz to the trial court, or that she argued in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15480 - 2005-03-31
MacFarlane Pheasant Farm, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin
a right of action against the condemnor” in “a court of record,” which may lead to a judgment that “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17944 - 2005-04-27
a right of action against the condemnor” in “a court of record,” which may lead to a judgment that “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17944 - 2005-04-27
State v. Nilsa I. Huertas
. Instead, she claimed not to know how the damage occurred. Thus, ample evidence in the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27
. Instead, she claimed not to know how the damage occurred. Thus, ample evidence in the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27