Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30161 - 30170 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 30161 - 30170 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Albert J. Armonda
. Armonda comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26, concerning the duties of an attorney whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16828 - 2005-03-31
. Armonda comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26, concerning the duties of an attorney whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16828 - 2005-03-31
[MS WORD]
JC-1611: Dispositional Order - Protection or Services (Chapter 48)
litem to perform any of the duties under § 48.235(4), Wis. Stats. |_| is continued for the following
/formdisplay/JC-1611.doc?formNumber=JC-1611&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-05-20
litem to perform any of the duties under § 48.235(4), Wis. Stats. |_| is continued for the following
/formdisplay/JC-1611.doc?formNumber=JC-1611&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
at the time. The prosecution was merely fulfilling the statutory duty to amend its discovery once more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30618 - 2007-10-16
at the time. The prosecution was merely fulfilling the statutory duty to amend its discovery once more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30618 - 2007-10-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
it was not in the prosecutor’s possession at the time. The prosecution was merely fulfilling the statutory duty to amend its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30618 - 2014-09-15
it was not in the prosecutor’s possession at the time. The prosecution was merely fulfilling the statutory duty to amend its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30618 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of discretion. State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶17, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 549, 678 N.W.2d 197, 203. We have a “‘duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72991 - 2011-10-31
of discretion. State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶17, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 549, 678 N.W.2d 197, 203. We have a “‘duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72991 - 2011-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
official misconduct and neglect of duty, as allowed under s. 73.03(3), and other statutes, please see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
official misconduct and neglect of duty, as allowed under s. 73.03(3), and other statutes, please see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
State v. Dennis W. Tushoski
the consent. Wege was under no duty to inform Tushoski of his right to refuse consent. See id. at 533, 504
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9115 - 2005-03-31
the consent. Wege was under no duty to inform Tushoski of his right to refuse consent. See id. at 533, 504
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9115 - 2005-03-31
County of Jefferson v. Sean S. Lynch
on Lynch’s motion to suppress evidence as follows. He was on duty the evening of October 6, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5734 - 2005-03-31
on Lynch’s motion to suppress evidence as follows. He was on duty the evening of October 6, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald J. Anderson v. County of Douglas
treasurer has no duty to notify all owners of the tax proceedings; notice to one is sufficient. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8961 - 2017-09-19
treasurer has no duty to notify all owners of the tax proceedings; notice to one is sufficient. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8961 - 2017-09-19
Keith E. Pischke v. Ken J. Sondalle
of or committed in the course of the discharge of the officer’s, employe’s or agent’s duties … unless within 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2115 - 2005-03-31
of or committed in the course of the discharge of the officer’s, employe’s or agent’s duties … unless within 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2115 - 2005-03-31